Appendix
'A'
APPLICATION
FOR INFORMATION
REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 6 OF RTI ACT, 2005
I.D. No. ..
(For
official use)
To,
The Central Public Information Officer (RTI)
Office of
Official Liquidator
Ministry Of Corporate Affairs,
High Court Of Bombay,
Bank Of India Building
5th Floor, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Mumbai- 400 023
Phone No: 022-22675008/22670024
Ministry Of Corporate Affairs,
High Court Of Bombay,
Bank Of India Building
5th Floor, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Mumbai- 400 023
Phone No: 022-22675008/22670024
1.
|
Full
Name of the Applicant
(in capital letters)
|
---------------------------------------------
|
2.
|
Father’s Name (in capital
letters):
|
--------------------------------------------
|
3.
|
Communication Address:
|
|
4.
|
Mobile No.
|
|
5.
|
Details of Application Fee
In favour of
“ Pay and account officer, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Mumbai”
|
IPO No :
D.D no:
Date:
Amount: Rs.10/-
|
6. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:
1.
The Managing Director
and other directors formed a Company in the Name and Style of City Limouzines (India) Ltd at
Registered office # 102, Mittal Tower,
‘B’ Wing, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 (INDIA) sales and marketing
office # 95-96 , Mittal Tower, ‘B’ Wing Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 and branches of the Company is
situated at Chennai,
Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune, Jaipur, U.S.A. The Managing Director of the Company is show
as one Mrs Geeta. R.
2.
I state that similarly another sister
company formed by same managing Director and other directors in the Name and
style of “City Realcom Ltd” at Registered office # 96, Mittal Tower, ‘B’ Wing, 9th Floor, Nariman
Point, Mumbai-400021 (INDIA) sales and marketing office # Sunama House, 1st
Floor, August Kranti Marg (kemps Corner), Opp.Shalimar Hotel, Grant Road (W),
Mumbai-400 026, Corporate office: 403, Stanford Plaza, Opp. Fame Adlabs, B-65,
New Link Road, Andheri (W) Mumbai-400 053 and branches of the Company is
situated at Chennai,
Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune, Jaipur, U.S.A. The Managing Director of the Company is show
as one Mrs Geeta. R.
3.
I state that the company was initially
formed for the aim of Car Leasing and slowly started investment Scheme in it.
For the investment Scheme, they advertised in the Magazines and circulated
pamphlets with attractive promises. Initially
they were also paying the Higher returns and the promise was to pay for 5 years
and on completion of 5 years, the deposit amount would be returned. Latter they
increased the monthly returns and
promised to return the deposit amount by 50%. There after further hiked the
monthly return and said that no amount would be paid on completion of 5 years.
4. Initially,
the payment of monthly returns were made through post dated local Cheques every
six monthly. There after the Directors commences many companies and formed a
CITY Group. The names of the company are
i.)
City
Limouzines (India) Ltd
ii.) City
Real Com Ltd
iii.)
City
Co-op Credit Society Ltd
iv.)
City
Communications Ltd
v.) City
Money Ltd
vi.) City
Trading L.L.C. (U.S.A)
vii.) City Airlines Pvt Ltd.
viii.) City Resorts
ix.)
City
Cine Vision Pvt Ltd.
x.) City Hospitalities Ltd.
xi.) City
Foundation
xii.) Chaman Automobiles( An H.P Outlet)
xiii.) Bharatratna Dr. Babasahieb Amedkar
Pratishthan
xiv.) Bharatratna Dr. Babasahieb Amedkar
Pratishthan Co-op Credit Society Ltd
And collected very huge amount from
general public. The Directors then slowly had transferred funds from one
company to another and started sending cheques from Bombay and their regional
offices. They have a preplanned move to cheat the investors and defraud, there
misappropriating multi crore rupees. The Directors started sending cheques only
for three months advance and slowly delaying the dispatch of cheques.
5. While
so, from 12-8-2009, the Cheques on depositing for collection started bouncing
for insufficient funds. On telephonic query, the staff and the Directors were
misleading the investors by saying that there is some audit going on and hence
there is some delay. They also even sending SMS to the Cell Phones to delay
depositing Cheques.
6. I submit that after this number
of FIR’s were lodged by investors at
difference place before EOW’s or at concerned local police stations against
Company and its directors i.e 17 Cases
in Maharashtra (Mumbai, Thane, Pune Stara) CR
Nos.74/2007 (EOW), CR No.55/2009, CR No.829/2010, CR
No.469/2009, CR No.28/2010,
CR No.401/2009, CR No.257/2009, CR No.368/2009, CR No.24/2010, CR No.46/2010, CR
No.486/2009, CR No.347/2009, CR NO.23/2010, CR No. No.95/2010, CR
No.205/2010, FIR No.347/2009, CR No.687/2006, Two case registered at
Bangalore FIR
No.165/2009, CR No.173/2010, Two cases registered at Chennai FIR
No.456/2009, CR No.194/2010 , Two cases at Andhra Pradesh (Hyderabad ) FIR No.299/2009, CR No.258/2009, Delhi 107 cases
registered CC No.7543/10, 232/11, 232/12, 233/11, 234/11,
227/11, 224/11, 223/11, 222/11,220/11, 219/11, 218/11, 213/11, 212/11, 211/11,
210/11, 209/11, 208/11, 207/11, 407/11, 471/11, 472/11, 473/11, 474/11, 475/11,
476/11, 477/11, 478/11, 479/11, 480/11, 481/11, 482/11, 483/11, 484/11, 484A/11,
455/11, 456/11, 457/11, 458/11, 459/11, 460/11, 461/11, 462/11, 463/11, 464/11,
465/11, 466/11, 467/11, 468/11, 469/11, 441/11, 445/11, 446/11, 447/11, 448/11,
449/11, 450/11, 451/11, 452/11, 522/11, 528/11, 590/11, 591/11, 592/11, 593/11,
595/11, 596/11, 597/11, 598/11, 599/11, 600/11, 602/11, 603/11, 604/11, 605/11,
608/11, 609/11, 610/11, 611/11, 612/11, 667/11, 668/11, 799/11, 800/11, 802/11,
805/11, 898/11, 920/11, 921/11, 922/11, 923/11, 926/11, 927/11, 30/13, 31/13,
673/13, 677/13, 654/13, 899/13, 847/13, 815/13, 925/13, 919/13, 936/13,
566/13, FIR Nos.255/2009, 54/2010 and Two cases at Rajasthan (Sikar) FIR Nos. 219/2012 & 40/2010.
7. I state that there are number of
complaint’s raised that to estimated more than 30,000 which is just tagged with
above Criminal complaints or FIR’s. This all happened in August 2009 and today
7 years passed , Number of Writ petitions, Criminal original petitions, Company
petitions and Company applications were filed. I states that Company directors
have filed more than 100 cases all over India, to come out from the clutches of
Law and in some cases they got success also because other side sufferers were
poor investors in which maximum percentages are ex servicemen, retired peoples,
who do not have sufficient means to hire the services of costly Advocates, depending on Government
Advocates to defend the cases.
8. I state that Company application was
filed before Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay for Liquidation, vide
Company petition No. 234 of 2010 for against City limouzines (India) Limited,
In this company petition Hon’ble High Court of Bombay appointed official
liquidator to liquidate the company by its order dated 03-12-2010 and another Company petition n. 326 of 2010 against
City Realcom Ltd. In, this company petition Hon’ble High Court of Bombay
appointed official liquidator to liquidate the company by its order dated 09-03-2012.
Further investors approached Hon,ble High Court for direction for liquidating
the assets of Companies and disposed the investors claims.
9.
I state that after this also company
directors have filed different cases either for quashing FIR or others either
in form of writ petitions or Criminal Original applications, but some how
curtailed by Court of Law. In these
Company petition nos. 234 & 326 of 2010 ,official liquidator report no. 126
of 2013/Liqn/IV was filed before Hon’ble High Court of Bombay and Hon’ble High
Court allowed the prayer clause (c) and
(d), which was for invite claims of the workers/ creditors accordingly Notices
was published by official liquidator in different language news papers on 30
March 2013 and last date was mentioned to submit claims was 30 Apr 2013.
Accordingly Investors submitted their claims to official liquidators office .
Some investors have received Admission notices with calculation sheet, but it
was done randomly not serially, reasons best known to official liquidator
office. Three years and Eight Months time passed after the last date of
receiving claims, but till date admission process is not completed. Whenever
any investors asks either by going personally or through telephone there
replies is very astonishing that there is no money.
10. I state that in above cases accused
Sayeed Mohd. Masood @ Sayyed M. Masud filed transfer petition before Hon’ble
Supreme Court CrlMp no. 3182-3197 / 2015
& 3198-3213/ 2015 in Transfer
Petition(s) Criminal No (s). 425-440/2014
and by an order of Hon’ble Supreme Court these all connected matters
from all Over India Pending in Maharshtra, Karnataka, Tamilnadu, Andhra
Pradesh, Rajasthan and New Delhi transferred to PMLA Court for Trial by its order dated 11 May
2015.
11.
I state that in this case huge amount
has been seized by different agencies involved in investigation. CA Even on Hon’ble High Court of Bombay
on 23 Sep 2013 in Company application
600 of 2012 in Company petition no. 234 of 2010 order was passed to hand over
180 Crores which is in the custody of EOW Mumbai. There are huge number of cases has been filed
at different courts of law. Poor investors are suffering , just running from
one pillar to another pillar but no remedy to their painful journey, whereas
Directors are enjoying due to the shield of
some officials.
12. I state that
that
as per times of India, Mumbai Edition news dated 15/04/2014 Enforcement Directorate has attached
fly-by-night operator City Group's properties and cash
totaling Rs 133.3 crore in the last four years, including Rs 6
crore in Switzerland banks. The latest attachment, both movable
and immovable properties worth Rs 6.48 Crore, was done recently, officials
said. I further states that on
30-6-2015, Times of
India , Mumbai Edition , page-7, as per this news the Enforcement Directorate
(ED) on 29-6-2015 (Monday) seized Rs.150 Crores that was parked in two bank
accounts in Singapore by S M Masood, Chairmen of two City Group Firms- City
Limouzines and City Realcom. I further states
13. I
further states that there are other places also cash and properties seized by
EOW’s.
14. I
state that I have invested a total of Rs………………….. (……………………………………………………………………………………) Vide File
No…………………….at Chennai / Delhi/ Mumbai/ Bangalore/ Hyderabad/ Jaipur in City Limouzines (India) Ltd and City Realcom Ltd.
15.
I state that number of company applications in these cases has been filed
frequently for direction, though directions issued by Hon’ble Courts of Law,
which is not feasible to write here, because it will fill only papers here. Adjudication
of claims have been started as per CA 583 of 2012, dated 03-09-2014 but only
few claimant investors have recived admission notice in the period of 3 years
08 months and Now information coming from some investors from Bombay, who
visited official liquidator office that it will take another two years time to
complete admission process.
DETAILS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED :
1.
Whether any amount has been handed over to your office
by the order of High Court order dated 23 Sep 2013 till date in with regard to
above mentioned companies .
2.
Whether
Enforcement Directorate handed over any seized amount against these Company to
your office or not
3.
Whether any amount and property has been handed over
to your office by EOW Chennai / EOW Hyderabad / EOW Bangalore till date:
4.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED)
has attached 160 acres of land owned by tainted City Group companies near
Lavasa in Pune, whether this property was handed over to your office or not .
5.
Whether Swiss bank accounts of Sayed Mohammed Masood
has been seized , if so what action taken to bring that money?
6.
On 30-6-2015 Times of India Bombay
edition The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday seized Rs.150 Crores that
was parked in two bank accounts in Singapore by S M Masood, Chairmen of two
City Group Firms- City Limouzines and City Realcom. Whether these seized money
has been brought to India, if so than whether handed over to official
liquidator office or not.
7.
Whether investors claims will be
disposed in time bound manner or not
8.
Whether Claims has been transferred to
MPID Court as per the Hon’ble High Court order of July 2017 or still pending.
9.
How many years more it will take to
dispose the claims of investors with regard to these two companies
Place: Signature
Date: Jan
2018 (Individual
Name)
Address:
MB:
DECLARATION
I
state that the information sought does not fall within the restriction
contained in Section 8 & 9 of the RTI Act and to the best of my knowledge
it pertains to your office.
Place:
Date: Jan 2017 ( Name & signature )
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF APPLICATION FOR SEEKING
INFORMATION
I.D. No. Dated: Jan
2017
1. Received an application from Shri …………………………………………………………….....
seeking information under section 6(1)
of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
Signature and stamp
of the Competent Authority
Dated: Jan
2017 Tel No.
I have just searching such information and here you describe it in very easy way. Thank you for sharing such information with us.
ReplyDeleteTax Advocate in India